In Re Browning

Good Law
108 Cal. App. 503·1930 Cal. App. LEXIS 291·291 P. 650
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaSeptember 25, 1930Docket No. 1993.California1,632 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Thompson, J.

The petitioner and the respondent were formerly husband and wife, but on June 20, 1928, petitioner was granted an interlocutory decree of divorce from the respondent. Subsequently the plaintiff in that action and the petitioner here asked and obtained a new trial respecting the division of the property and the custody of the minor child of the parties, Thurlough Browning. At the conclusion of this second trial, and on January 24, 1929, the superior court rendered its decision concerning the property and giving the petitioner here the custody of the .child, with the exceptions that the respondent was to have the custody of their son every Tuesday and Thursday commencing at 12 o’clock noon and ending at 8 P. M. and every alternate Saturday beginning at noon and until 8 P. M. of the following Sunday, and every alternate “legal bank holiday” from 8 o’clock in the morning until 8 o’clock in the evening and further he was given the custody during one month of each school vacation period. Furthermore, the court appointed a physician to supervise and care for the health of the child and an oculist to prescribe and give treatment for his eyes. This judgment also confirmed the prior…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.