Vedovi

Vedovi v. Demartini

Good Law
107 Cal. App. 567·1930 Cal. App. LEXIS 351·290 P. 588
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaAugust 6, 1930Docket No. 7342.California467 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Sturtevant, J.

The plaintiff, as a realtor, sued to recover commissions alleged to be due under a listing agreement. The court made findings against the plaintiff and from a judgment entered thereon he has appealed.

The plaintiff pleaded in haec verba a written contract which contained a covenant that “in case a sale is made within ninety (90) days after the termination of this agreement at the above mentioned price or for any different price or terms or conditions other than those herein specified to a party or parties with whom said agent negotiated during its life, I agree to pay the said agent the commission hereinabove provided.” He also pleaded that during the life of his contract he negotiated with Damito Del Bueno, who later bought the property within the 90-day ■ period. The trial court made findings against the plaintiff. There was evidence to sustain those findings. The plaintiff introduced evidence that he and his agents negotiated with Del Bueno and with his sister and her son, who were, he claimed, the agents of Del Bueno. But Del Beuno testified that the plaintiff and his agents never negotiated with him and that he had never appointed his sister and her son as his agents. The…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.