Kramer

Kramer v. Associated Almond Growers

Good Law
111 Cal. App. 595·1931 Cal. App. LEXIS 1164·295 P. 873
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaFebruary 5, 1931Docket No. 341.California1,991 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Jennings, J.

This is an action instituted by respondents to recover damages alleged to have been sustained by them by reason of certain false and fraudulent representations made by appellant which induced the respondents to enter into a contract for the purchase of an eighty-four acre tract of land, seventy-two acres of which were planted to three year old almond trees and to make payments in compliance with the terms of the contract, which amounted to a total of $15,400.

It appears that during the years 1919 and 1920 three of the respondents resided in the state of Iowa and that the fourth was a resident of Omaha, Nebraska. During the latter part of the year 1919 the respondent H. B. Kramer had his attention directed to a certain booklet entitled: “A Life Income Plus California.” This booklet was published by the appellant and described in the most glowing terms the financial profit to be derived from investments in land near San Luis Obispo, California, owned by appellant to be planted to almond trees. The interest o£ respondents was so aroused by the contents of the booklet that three of them came to California for the purpose of investigating the proposition. During their stay in San Luis…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.