Lawson

Lawson v. Rusconi

Good Law
112 Cal. App. 366·1931 Cal. App. LEXIS 1153·296 P. 628
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMarch 6, 1931Docket No. 319.California1,635 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Barnard, J.

The defendants were in the business of purchasing fresh grapes in the San Joaquin Valley and shipping the same to and selling them in various eastern markets. It is an admitted fact that shippers of such grapes frequently suffered loss and damage by reason of decay and mold of the grapes, when shipped in ordinary refrigerator-cars. In September, 1927, the defendants entered into two contracts with the plaintiff, each of which contracts recited that the plaintiff was the owner and entitled to the exclusive use in California of a certain device or apparatus known as an Esofumer, being a device for the diffusion of sulphur dioxide gas. Under these contracts, the plaintiff leased to defendants and the defendants hired from the plaintiff two of these machines, with the right to use the same for a period of three months, the defendants paying a deposit of $100 on each machine, which deposit was to be returned when the machines were redelivered. The defendants further agreed to pay to the plaintiff $10 for each car of grapes treated by the use of said Esofumer, the plaintiff agreeing to furnish the necessary gas. It is conceded that these machines were to be used to diffuse gas through…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.