Towle

Towle v. Sweeney

Good Law
1905 Cal. App. LEXIS 139·2 Cal. App. 29·83 P. 74
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaOctober 18, 1905No. 58.California1,686 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Harrison, J.

The firm of Gardner & Boyden, as contractors, entered into a contract with one Probert, as owner, for the erection of a dwelling-house in San Francisco, and at the same time the defendants herein, as sureties, in connection with said contractors, as principals, executed a bond in the penal sum of $1,500 to any and all persons who should perform labor or furnish materials to the contractors, conditioned that, if the said contractors “shall fully pay to the said person or persons performing labor or furnishing materials” the value of such labor or materials, said obligation should be void; otherwise, to remain in full force and effect. The plaintiffs herein furnished the contractors certain materials, which were used in the construction of the dwelling-house, and, the contractors not having paid for the same, brought the present action against the sureties to recover from them the value of the materials so furnished. The construction of the dwelling-house was completed November 26, 1895, and the present action was commenced April 8, 1898. The defendants set up the statute of limitations (Code Civ. Proc., sec. 339, subd. 1) in their answer as a defense to the action, and the court…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.