Quinn

Quinn v. Rike

Good Law
1920 Cal. App. LEXIS 51·50 Cal. App. 243·194 P. 761
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaDecember 2, 1920Civ. No. 3624.California676 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Kerrigan, J.

This action was brought against defendant Rike as a maker, and the defendant Ceres Land Company as indorser, upon a promissory note.

There is no dispute as to the facts: In January, 1916, the defendant N. C. Rike executed and delivered to her

codefendant Ceres Land Company a promissory note, negotiable in form, in the sum of two thousand dollars. For the purpose of securing payment of the same she made and executed a deed of trust to a certain title insurance and trust company. The note was, therefore, non-negotiable. (Metropolis Trust & Sav. Bank v. Monnier, 169 Cal. 592 , [ 147 Pac. 265 ].) At the time of the execution of the note here sued upon the land and premises described in the deed of trust was subject to a prior encumbrance of eleven thousand dollars. Thereafter, and before the maturity of the note here involved, the Ceres Land Company, for a valuable consideration, transferred the note to plaintiff, J. E. Quinn, which was evidenced by a writing on the back thereof, in the following language:

Subsequent to this transfer the first encumbrance upon the premises described in the deed of trust was foreclosed, and by reason thereof the security of the note here involved…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.