Natoli

Natoli v. Davis

Good Law
1925 Cal. App. LEXIS 89·75 Cal. App. 309·242 P. 895
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaNovember 24, 1925Docket No. 2927.California3,553 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Plummer, J.

Action by plaintiff to recover damages for injury to grapes in transit while the carriers on which the grapes were shipped were under government control. Plaintiff had judgment and the defendant appeals.

The action was begun on the first day of November, 1921, naming as defendants Southern Pacific Company and John Barton Payne, as agent, under section 206 of the act of Congress of the United States, known as the Transportation Act. Summons was issued in said action on the fourteenth day of July, 1922, and on the sixteenth day of August, 1922, an amended complaint was filed herein naming as defendants Southern Pacific Company and James C. Davis, as agent, under section 206 of the act of Congress of the United States, known as the Transportation Act, etc., and on the thirteenth day of October, 1922, a second amended complaint was filed herein, naming as defendant only James C. Davis, as agent as aforesaid. The shipment of grapes referred to herein took place in the fall of 1919. The defendant James C. Davis appeared and filed a demurrer to the second amended complaint, alleging, among other things, that said second amended complaint did not state a cause of action against said…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.