Seitz

Security Commercial & Savings Bank v. Seitz

Good Law
1919 Cal. App. LEXIS 756·43 Cal. App. 353·185 P. 188
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaSeptember 24, 1919Civ. No. 3037.California1,776 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Nourse, J.

This is an action to foreclose a mortgage given to secure the payment of a promissory note for ten thousand dollars executed by the' defendants, A. F. Mack and Wm. Seitz, Jr., and to enforce the payment of a written guaranty for the payment of said note subsequently executed by the defendant, Wm. Seitz, Sr. The note was executed and delivered to the Blochman Banking Company, a eo partnership consisting of L. A. Blochman and J. A. Heap. This bank was subsequently incorporated under the name of Blochman Commercial & Savings Bank, and thereafter the name was changed by a decree of court to Security Commercial & Savings Bank of San Diego, the plaintiff and. respondent herein.

The circumstances surrounding the execution of the note and mortgage are as follows:

One del Fungo, a real estate operator, induced the defendants, Mack and Seitz, Jr., to purchase some ninety acres of land situated in San Diego County at the agreed price of twenty-two thousand five hundred dollars. Payment therefor was made by these defendants by the execution and delivery of three promissory notes, dated November 15, 1912; one for six thousand dollars, which was delivered directly to del Fungo; one for six…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.