Pidgeon

Pidgeon v. Lamb

Good Law
133 Cal. App. 342·1933 Cal. App. LEXIS 697·24 P.2d 206
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJuly 18, 1933Docket No. 679.California1,909 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Turpentine, J.

Plaintiffs filed this action seeking to quiet title to three placer mining claims. Defendant answered denying plaintiffs’ title and asserted title in himself. Judgment was rendered in favor of defendant quieting his title as against plaintiffs except as hereinafter noted. From this judgment plaintiffs appeal.

On March 25, 1911, A. R. Lendner and his associates, all citizens of the United States, went in and upon unoccupied and unappropriated mineral lands of the United States and located ten contiguous placer mining claims under the claim names of Sheep Creek Placer Mining Claims numbered 1 to 10, inclusive, constituting a consolidated group. The land at the time of entry had been duly surveyed by the United States government and the sections and legal subdivisions thereof were distinctly marked by said United States public survey so that the exterior boundaries of the sections and subdivisions thereof could be readily traced and the quarter-section corners thereof could be easily ascertained. All locations were according to and coincided with the legal subdivisions of the property, according to the United States public survey. Mineral in place, to wit, certain lime deposits of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.