Pinque

Pinque v. J. B. Hill Co.

Good Law
1923 Cal. App. LEXIS 441·62 Cal. App. 457·217 P. 101
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJune 8, 1923Civ. No. 4385.California898 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Nourse, J.

Plaintiff sued for the recovery of damages sustained by reason of the taking of certain personal property under a writ of, execution on a judgment which was subsequently reversed on appeal. Plaintiff herein, who was the defendant and judgment debtor in the former action, was a tenant of the defendant herein. The former action lay in two counts, one alleging a cause of action in ejectment in the ordinary form and the other alleging that the plaintiff therein had elected to terminate the lease upon the ground that the lessee had forfeited her rights under the terms of the lease. Judgment in that action went for the plaintiff but was reversed on appeal to the supreme court. (J. B. Hill Co. v. Pinque, 179 Cal. 759 [3 A. L. R. 669, 178 Pac. 952 ].) The judgment in the superior court had, however, allowed the J. B. Hill Co. $509 by way of dam ages for injury to the building and the further sum of $300 as the value of the use and occupation of the premises. Execution was had upon that judgment pending the appeal, and the personal property, consisting of machinery, tools, and appliances used by the lessee for the purpose of conducting an automobile garage, was sold and the defendant…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.