Hamilton

Hamilton v. Consolidated Water Co.

Caution
1921 Cal. App. LEXIS 8·56 Cal. App. 7·204 P. 416
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaDecember 29, 1921Civ. No. 3573.California2,043 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Craig, J.

This suit involves the ownership to six and one-half inches of water measured under a four-inch pressure, to quiet title to which the action is brought. The water in question is produced from tunnels in section 3, township 1 south, range 8 west, S. B. M., which are on the property of the defendant. The plaintiffs also seek to enjoin the defendant from diminishing or interfering with the de livery of the six and one-half inches of water which the plaintiffs claim to own collectively. The defendant admits that the plaintiffs have an interest in said six and one-half inches of water, but claim that it consists of merely the right to six and one-half one hundred and seventeenths parts of the output of the said tunnels as they existed on the twenty-eighth day of January, 1895, and that the interest of the plaintiffs is subject to the right of the defendant to diminish the delivery of said six and one-half inches proportionately whenever the output of said tunnels falls below 117 inches.

It appears, without contradiction, that on the twenty-eighth day of January, 1895, Peter Flemming and James Beckett and J. T. Brady were the owners of the tunnel and the pipe-line running between the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.