McLelland

Third Street Improvement Co. v. McLelland

Good Law
1913 Cal. App. LEXIS 137·23 Cal. App. 369·137 P. 1089
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaNovember 26, 1913Civ. No. 1189.California1,253 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Kerrigan, J.

This is an appeal -from a judgment of nonsuit.' The action was for money had and received by the defendants for the use and benefit of the plaintiff. The answers of the defendants denied the receipt of the money.

Upon the trial of the case the secretary of the corporation plaintiff testified that the defendants, as copartners, erected a building for the plaintiff in San Francisco, and that at or about the time of the completion of the building there was an agreement of settlement in writing between the parties. This agreement was introduced in evidence and consisted of an itemization of sums paid by plaintiff to the defendants and' an agreement as to the mode of payment of the balance still remaining due, the amount of which was found and fixed by the writing. The witness testified that the balance so agreed upon was subsequently paid. He also testified that about four months prior to entering into the written settlement the plaintiff paid to the defendants the sum of five hundred dollars which, by inadvertence, was not entered in the books of the plaintiff, and consequently was not taken into consideration in the negotiations for settlement, nor had the plaintiff received credit…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.