Woodhead Lumber Co. v. E. G. Niemann Investments, Inc.
Opinion
Lead Opinion
Lucas, J.
Appellant Woodhead Lumber Company, a corporation, appeals from a judgment of dismissal entered after the court sustained the demurrer of defendant and respondent Detroit Fidelity and Surety Company to appellant’s amended complaint, without leave to amend.
The amended complaint in substance alleges that on or about December 5, 1925, defendant E. G. Niemann Investments, Inc., the owner of certain real property situate in the city of Los Angeles, entered into a contract with appellant by which it was agreed that the latter would furnish services, and materials to said defendant to be used in the construction of a building to be erected upon said real property; that appellant with the knowledge and consent of said defendant and between the dates of February 26, 1926, and April 24, 1926, furnished such materials and performed such services, the reasonable value of which was the sum of $6,443.60, but that no part thereof, other than a small sum credited for materials returned, has been paid.
•' It is further alleged that the respondent Detroit Fidelity and Surety Company, on or about January 14, 1926, entered into a contract of surety with said defendant E. G. Niemann Investments,…