Wilson

Los Angeles Investment Co. v. Wilson

Good Law
1922 Cal. App. LEXIS 50·60 Cal. App. 53·212 P. 211
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaDecember 4, 1922Civ. No. 3968.California3,874 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Conrey, J.

This is an action to quiet the title of plaintiff in and to certain real property against adverse claims of the defendants. In addition to their answer, the defendants filed a cross-complaint, seeking to enforce the rights of defendant Jennie B. Wilson as purchaser of the same property from the plaintiff under a contract entered into on or about the twenty-second day of March, 1913.

On the third day of April, 1916, the plaintiff, claiming that Mrs. Wilson was in default by reason of nonpayment of installments due under the agreement, served upon her notice that it exercised its option to declare the agreement terminated and all her rights to the property forfeited, and demanded that she forthwith deliver possession of the property to said Investment Company. The defendants having continued in possession, notwithstanding said notice and demand, the company, on the eighteenth day of May, 1916, commenced an action to terminate the agreement. In that action the superior court entered judgment canceling the agreement and quieting plaintiff’s title to the premises. On appeal to the supreme court that judgment was reversed. For a further statement of the facts showing the terms of the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.