Bannon

People v. Bannon

Good Law
1922 Cal. App. LEXIS 113·59 Cal. App. 50·209 P. 1029
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaSeptember 6, 1922Crim. No. 881.California4,903 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Finlayson, J.

The appellant, Edward Bannon, and his wife, Elizabeth Bannon, were charged with the murder of James H. Brigham, alleged to have been committed on September 10, 1921, at Sawtelle, in Los Angeles County. The two defendants were tried jointly. Elizabeth Bannon was acquitted, but her husband was convicted of murder in the second degree. He appeals from the judgment of conviction and likewise from the order denying his motion for a new trial.

That Edward Bannon shot and killed Brigham is an undisputed fact; but it is claimed that he shot in self-defense. The record here is very voluminous. We shall not attempt to give more than a bare outline of the case, sufficient, however, to make understandable the points to be discussed. It seems that appellant, a young man about twenty-seven years of age, was employed as a motorman on the Pacific Electric Railway. The deceased, who was about forty years old and employed as a terminal foreman for the same company, was Bannon’s superior. Bannon claims that shortly prior to the tragedy his wife confessed to him that she had been debauched by Brigham, who, it was claimed, had forced his way into the Bannon home during the husband’s absence. On the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.