Houghton

Houghton v. Kuehnrich

Good Law
1920 Cal. App. LEXIS 771·46 Cal. App. 469·189 P. 457
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMarch 10, 1920Civ. No. 2075.California1,392 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Ellison, J.

Plaintiff sued defendant for four thousand dollars real estate commission for procuring one Ralph Granger to assent to the terms of an agreement for exchange of real estate, which was drawn by defendant’s attorney. The cause was tried before a jury, which rendered a verdict for four thousand dollars in favor of the plaintiff. The trial court granted defendant’s motion for a new trial, and from this order the plaintiff has appealed.

The pleadings admit that the defendant executed and delivered a certain instrument, which is set forth in paragraph I of the complaint, and which appears to be an agreement for the exchange of real property between the defendant, P. Max Kuehnrich, as party of the first part, and Ralph Granger, as party of the second part. It was stated in said agreement that the party of the first part therein (the defendant herein) was the owner of certain property in Los Angeles (describing it), which he desired to exchange for" certain real property in Brooklyn, New York (describing it), owned by Ralph Granger, the party of the second part therein. The terms upon which the defendant was willing to exchange his property for the property of Granger" are therein set…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.