Salvation Army v. Daily Telegram

Good Law
125 Cal. App. 743·14 P.2d 123
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaSeptember 13, 1932Docket No. 7464.California1,274 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Tappaan, J.

The plaintiff had judgment in the court below and the defendant appeals therefrom. The action was one for the recovery of the monthly installments of rent reserved to be paid to plaintiff under the terms of a ten-year lease it had with defendant. By a supplemental complaint, filed by stipulation of the parties to the action, plaintiff added to its demand installments of rent and taxes which had accrued since the amended complaint was filed herein. At the time of trial defendant’s counsel stated that its defense would be rested solely on the allegations of a certain amendment to its pleading, which amendment read as follows: “For a further and affirmative defense to this action defendant alleges, that after the defendant had quit the possession of said leased property as alleged aforesaid, the plaintiff notified the defendant that it would take possession of said property, would re-lease the same, and would hold the defendant liable for any difference between the rents received from such re-leasing of the premises and the amount stipulated to be paid by the defendant under the terms and provisions of said lease.”

The facts, as disclosed by the record here, are as follows:…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.