Davis

Davis v. Alioto

Good Law
122 Cal. App. 740·1932 Cal. App. LEXIS 1218·10 P.2d 467
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaApril 21, 1932Docket No. 8097.California538 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Nourse, J.

This is an appeal from an order terminating proceedings to obtain the reporter’s transcript provided for by section 953a of the Code of Civil Procedure.

In an action for personal injuries verdict was rendered for defendant on June 17, 1926. Judgment was entered on the verdict on June 17, 1926. A notice of motion for new trial was given, but the motion was not pressed. Notice of appeal was given August 23, 1926, and on the same day plaintiff filed with the county clerk a notice to prepare the transcripts pursuant to section 953a of the Code of Civil Procedure. On March 5, 1930, the reporter delivered to the county clerk a partial transcript of the proceedings. Thereupon defendant moved to terminate proceedings to obtain the transcript. The motion was granted after a full hearing at which evidence both documentary and oral was taken.

The appeal from this order presents the single question whether the trial court abused its discretion in terminating the proceedings. The code section requires the filing of the reporter’s transcript within twenty days after the notice to prepare is filed. The time taken here was approximately three years and was not extended by stipulation or order…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.