People v. Clement

Bad Law
1929 Cal. App. LEXIS 823·97 Cal. App. 238·275 P. 511
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaFebruary 26, 1929Docket No. 1523.California1,072 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Koford, J.

Appellant Clement and a co-defendant, Turner, were charged in separate counts with two crimes— robbery and conspiracy to commit robbery. Defendant Turner pleaded guilty to the charge of robbery and judgment was duly pronounced against him. Appellant Clement pleaded not guilty to both charges. He was found not guilty of robbery and guilty of conspiracy “as charged in the second count of the information.”

The first count after charging robbery further alleged that at the time of the robbery Turner was armed with a deadly weapon and that at the time the defendants were arrested appellant was armed with a concealed deadly weapon. The second count charged conspiracy to commit the same robbery, alleging as overt acts (1) proceeding to the scene of the crime, (2) the arming of Turner with a revolver, (3) the robbery itself and (4) that appellant acted as lookout. The information further alleged that the second count charged acts which were part of the same transaction and event described in the first count.

The court gave the jury a blank form of verdict finding the defendant guilty of robbery in the first degree. As to the second count no instruction was either given by the court or…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.