Gallentine

Gallentine v. Fierro

Good Law
110 Cal. App. 345·1930 Cal. App. LEXIS 64·294 P. 59
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaDecember 10, 1930Docket No. 320.California489 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Warmer, J.

This case was tried without a jury. The court found in favor of the plaintiff and judgment was entered for $12,760. J. M. Gallentine and plaintiff were husband and wife. On the thirtieth day of November, 1929, while a passenger in the automobile of one George Harris, J. M. Gallentine was injured in a collision between the automobiles of the said Harris and the defendant and as a result of said injuries the said Gallentine died. The deceased and plaintiff had been married about thirty-five years. Deceased was fifty-nine years of age at the time of his death, a common laborer earning from $85 to $100 per month. The sole question presented on this appeal is, did the court err in finding that defendant had been damaged in the sum of $12,760, which appellant claims to be excessive. Since the filing of the briefs on appeal the plaintiff, respondent herein, has filed a consent that the judgment may be reduced from $12,760 to $5,000. The question therefore now presented is, would a finding of damages in the sum of $5,000 be excessive. In Zibbell v. Southern Pac. Ry. Co., 160 Cal. 237 , at page 254 [ 116 Pac. 513, 520 ], the court says: “It has been decided by this court that the only…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.