Brode

Brode v. Clark

Good Law
1916 Cal. App. LEXIS 323·31 Cal. App. 182·159 P. 1048
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJuly 29, 1916Civ. No. 1996.California300 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

James, J.

This appeal is taken from an order granting to the defendant a new trial. The notice of appeal specifies that the appeal was taken from an order entered on the eleventh day of September, 1913. There appears not to have been any formal minute order entered, but the court filed a written order which, after directing that a new trial be granted, set out certain argument, evidently the opinion of the court, upon one question of law involved in the case. The motion for a new trial was made upon various grounds, including that of the insufficiency of the evidence to sustain the findings of the court. It appears that there was contradictory evidence as to certain issues presented. Notwithstanding that the written order of court contains a statement of what purports to be the reasons influencing the court in granting the motion, we think the order must be treated as a general one, and that it must 'be assumed in that case that the court, not having expressly limited its order to other definite grounds, may have granted the motion because of the insufficiency of the evidence. The evidence presenting a conflict as to material matters, this court has no function to review the action of the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.