Fleming

Mitchell v. Fleming

Good Law
1926 Cal. App. LEXIS 312·77 Cal. App. 241·246 P. 152
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMarch 22, 1926Docket No. 4144.California2,322 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Works, J.

Plaintiff instituted suit against defendants for the recovery of the sum of $400. The complaint consisted of three counts, each attempting to state, in a different form from the other two, a cause of action to recover a single judgment for the amount. Plaintiff had judgment as prayed and defendants appeal.

The first cause of action attempted to be set forth in the complaint was' demurred to on the ground that it failed to state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action and the demurrer was overruled. It is now contended that the ruling was error. The first count alleges facts showing that one Parker was bound to pay to appellants, who were assignees of one McFarland, as rental under a certain sub lease, the sum of $300 per month for a term of years, commencing on August 1, 1918. Then follow allegations tending to show that prior to June 25, 1918, appellants were obligated to pay to respondent the sum of $400. There is next this averment, in which is embodied the gist of the count: “That on or about the 2'5th day of June, 1918, an account was stated between plaintiff and said defendants, and it was then ascertained and agreed that there would be due, owing and unpaid to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.