Menefee

Menefee v. Raisch Improvement Co.

Good Law
1926 Cal. App. LEXIS 350·78 Cal. App. 785·248 P. 1031
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJuly 23, 1926Docket No. 5338.California1,243 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Cashin, J.

An action was brought by plaintiff alleging that defendant corporation, in the operation of a motor-truck owned by it, negligently caused damage to an automobile in the possession of plaintiff, the elements of damage alleged being injuries to the automobile and the temporary loss of its use. Judgment was entered for plaintiff, from which defendant appealed.

The grounds urged for reversal are that defendant’s special demurrer should have been sustained; that the evidence was insufficient to support the findings, and that the court failed to find on the issue of contributory negligence.

The testimony shows that the injuries alleged were caused on July 25, 1924, while plaintiff was driving in a northerly direction on the east side of Lincoln Avenue in Santa Clara County; that the automobile was one in his possession under a contract for its purchase and used in the course of his occupation; that when he reached a point twenty feet south of a private road or driveway leading into the highway from the east and a view of which was obstructed by shrubbery defendant’s truck emerged therefrom; that no warning of its approach was given and that no horn or other warning device was carried…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.