Heinrich

People v. Heinrich

Good Law
1924 Cal. App. LEXIS 585·65 Cal. App. 510·224 P. 466
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaFebruary 6, 1924Crim. No. 1049.California2,345 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Houser, J.

Defendant was charged by indictment with an attempt to commit grand larceny. From a judgment of conviction and from an order denying his motion for new trial defendant has appealed to this court.

In brief, the evidence shows that defendant advertised in a newspaper for a superintendent to take charge of a large ranch at a salary of $350 per month and a percentage of the income from the ranch, and requiring that such superintendent deposit with defendant a cash bond. A Mr. Crandell, who was a detective in the office of the district attorney, answered the advertisement. Later Mr. Crandell met defendant and had a conversation with him regarding the proposed employment, in which conversation defendant informed Mr. Crandell that he had a large estate in Mexico, consisting of several small ranches, on each of which a foreman was employed; that the position offered was that of a superintendent who would have charge of all the foremen and handle the wages of the employees, and that it would be necessary that Crandell put up a cash bond in the sum of $5,000, or that in lieu of cash he might take a Mexican surety bond. Defendant also told Crandell that the land was owned by a London…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.