Hocknell

Hercules Oil Refining Co. v. Hocknell

Good Law
1907 Cal. App. LEXIS 258·5 Cal. App. 702·91 P. 341
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJune 7, 1907Civ. No. 345.California2,322 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Taggart, J.

This is an action to recover from defendants, as directors of the corporation plaintiff, moneys of the corporation alleged to have been embezzled and misappropriated by an officer of the corporation during the term of office of said directors. The officer who was charged with the misappropriation (defendant Hocknell) was not before the court, but the other defendants appeared and defended, and as to them, and each of them, the court granted a motion for a nonsuit.

Plaintiff appeals from the judgment and presents a bill of exceptions on the ruling of the court granting the nonsuit.

The charge against Hocknell, as president, rests upon the following facts, to wit: On November 25, 1902, the board of directors of plaintiff adopted a resolution authorizing and empowering the defendant, B. L. Vickrey, as secretary of the company, to sell and dispose of all the remaining treasury stock of plaintiff (being 130,000 shares of the par value of $1 per share) at the best price obtainable in the market. November 26, 1902, thirteen certificates (Nos. 1718 to 1730, inclusive) of said stock for 10,000 shares each, were issued to C. Walton Cannon, a broker in New York City, and forwarded to him…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.