Pacific Heater Manufacturing Co. v. Southern Pacific Co.

Good Law
1920 Cal. App. LEXIS 677·45 Cal. App. 748·188 P. 600
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaFebruary 3, 1920Civ. No. 2564.California907 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Conrey, J.

This action was brought by plaintiff to recover the sum of $927.50 for alleged damages to a shipment of fifty-three gas furnaces or heaters which were transported over the lines of the defendant company from the city of Los Angeles, California, to Portland, Oregon, consigned to the Portland Gas & Coke Company, at Portland, and there tendered to the consignee. The consignee refused to accept them, it being claimed by the consignee, and now claimed by the plaintiff, that by reason of damages "to the property during transportation its value was totally destroyed. Pursuant to the verdict of a jury, plaintiff recovered judgment for the entire amount of the demand. From that judgment the defendant appeals.

Appellant contends that it was the duty of the consignee, and upon failure of the consignee, then the duty of the plaintiff to have received said furnaces upon tender of delivery by the defendant, in order that the damage to the furnaces might be minimized and not unnecessarily enhanced ; and that the damages awarded are excessive. [1] The rule governing the duty of a shipper or consignee, where goods are injured in course of shipment, is stated as follows: “As a general rule, the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.