Schuster

Schuster v. Superior Court

Good Law
1929 Cal. App. LEXIS 710·98 Cal. App. 619·277 P. 509
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMay 2, 1929Docket No. 6083.California3,577 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

This original proceeding is

brought to prevent the respondent court from proceeding further in an action entitled Arthur Schuster et al., Plaintiffs, v. Adolf Schuster et al., Defendants, and particularly to prevent the respondent court from sentencing the petitioner for contempt of court, because of his failure to answer questions at the time fixed for the giving of his deposition. The principal contention of the petitioner is that the respondent court has no jurisdiction over the subject matter of the action, or assuming that it has" jurisdiction, it ought not to seek as a matter of comity to exercise the jurisdiction. The following constitute the salient facts: Benjamin Schuster, a resident of Apaché County, Arizona, died December 10, 1911. His will was admitted to probate by the superior court of that county and state on January 2, 1912, and letters testamentary were issued to the executors named in the will, to wit: Adolf Schuster (the petitioner herein), Max' Schuster (now deceased) and Josephine Schuster (the widow of deceased and one of the plaintiffs in the action now pending in the respondent court). By the terms of the will a large portion of the estate was given to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.