McWilliams

McWilliams v. Hudson

Good Law
1929 Cal. App. LEXIS 586·98 Cal. App. 185·276 P. 598
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaApril 9, 1929Docket No. 3717.California1,334 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Moncur, J.

This is an appeal from an order of the trial court relieving respondents from their failure to file a bill of exceptions within ten days after notice of entry of an order denying a motion for a new trial.

In an action commenced by respondents herein, plaintiffs below, against appellants, judgment went for the appellants. Plaintiffs, within the time allowed by law, moved for a new trial, and the motion was denied on September 8, 1925, and notice of decision was served on respondents’ counsel on September 17, 1925. No order or stipulation extending time within which to file a bill of exceptions was made. On October 31, 1925, plaintiffs, without notice to the defendants, or their counsel, made an ex parte application to the court for relief from their failure to file a proposed bill of exceptions within the period provided by law, and asked for leave of court to serve and file their proposed bill of exceptions to be used on appeal from the judgment rendered in the action, by November 6, 1925. The application was made upon the affidavit of one of counsel for plaintiffs, and on October 31, 1925, the trial judge made and entered an order relieving plaintiffs from their said failure to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.