Peloian

Peloian v. Waldman

Good Law
1921 Cal. App. LEXIS 401·54 Cal. App. 116·201 P. 344
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaAugust 31, 1921Civ. No. 3916.California1,008 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Waste, J.

The plaintiffs brought this action in assumpsit to recover one thousand dollars' alleged to have been received by the defendant for their use. The defendant answered, denying the indebtedness, and by way of a further defense set up a contract for the purchase and sale of real estate, entered into by the plaintiffs, the payment of one thousand dollars as a deposit and part of the purchase price, the violation of the terms of the agreement on the part of the plaintiffs, and the retention by defendant of the one thousand dollars as liquidated damages because of the breach of the contract. The lower court found the facts to be as alleged in the answer, except that it determined that it was the defendant who breached the agreement for the purchase of the real property, and that it was he who had not performed the conditions of the contract. It held that plaintiffs were entitled to recover the money paid, and entered judgment accordingly. Defendant has appealed.

The facts upon which the court based its decision are few and without apparent conflict. On December 20, 1919, through the medium of a real estate agent, the plaintiffs entered into an agreement with the defendant for the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.