Mueller

San Francisco Casing Co. v. Mueller

Good Law
1919 Cal. App. LEXIS 199·39 Cal. App. 394·179 P. 211
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJanuary 18, 1919Civ. No. 2569.California477 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Kerrigan, J.

This is an action to recover a certain balance of an account for goods sold and delivered by plaintiff to the defendants. In the answer the sale and delivery of the goods is admitted, but under facts therein alleged the defendants deny liability, and in a cross-complaint they set forth a breach of warranty as to part of the goods, and demand an affirmative judgment in their favor. The trial court found in accordance with the allegations of the cross-complaint, and rendered a judgment in favor of the defendants.

The particular item of the account which is the basis of this controversy arises from an order for sheep casings dated February 12,1917. These casings were delivered March 28, 1917, and two days later the defendants in writing rejected them as unsatisfactory for the purpose for which they were bought. There is an abundance of evidence in the record that the casings were expressly warranted as suitable for defendants’ business and sound and merchantable, and also that they did not comply with such warranty. Plaintiff claims that the contract for the sale of the sheep casings was in writing, and that oral evidence was inadmissible to show the express warranty. It does not…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.