W. Ross Campbell Co. v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.

Good Law
136 Cal. App. 765·1934 Cal. App. LEXIS 1071·29 P.2d 910
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaFebruary 20, 1934Docket No. 8171.California2,095 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Archbald, J.

Suit was brought by plaintiff to recover a balance of $3,500 on an earned commission of $8,500. It was admitted that defendant agreed in writing to pay the total commission of $8,500 and that but $5,000 thereof was actually paid. Defendant set up as an affirmative defense that the purchaser to whom the property was sold, on which sale the commission was earned, defaulted and refused to perform its obligation to purchase and asked to be relieved from such obligation. This was agreed to by defendant, providing the latter was released from paying the balance of such commission. On April 4, 1929, plaintiff executed and delivered to defendant the following writing:

A written stipulation filed by the parties in effect sets out the foregoing facts as well as others which we do not deem material here, but which tended to show that the original escrow was not canceled, but was kept alive by agreement pending action upon an option given to Mr. Van Vleet, the president of "Urban Properties Company, to purchase the property in question, which option was finally taken up and title to the property was vested in said company, which in turn executed deeds to the real purchasers, evidently to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.