Diamond

Diamond v. Fay

Good Law
1913 Cal. App. LEXIS 233·23 Cal. App. 566·138 P. 933
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaDecember 24, 1913Civ. No. 1326.California1,632 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

James, J.

Defendant was the owner of a lot of land on one of the principal streets- of the city of Los Angeles which he desired to sell or lease. Plaintiff, a real estate broker, was authorized in writing by defendant to find a purchaser for the property, or a tenant who would lease it for five or ten years. The written authorization which was signed by the defendant contained the following condition: “And it is agreed, that in case he shall secure a purchaser or tenant for said property I agree to pay him the regular brokerage or commission for selling i. e., a sum equal to 5% on the first $1,000, and 2%% on the remainder of the purchase price accepted by me, provided that no commission shall be less than $100, said commission to be paid out of the first money received. In case of a lease, will pay the commission on usual basis.”

Plaintiff in his complaint alleged that pursuant to the authority so given he found a person who was ready, able, and willing to rent and lease the property of defendant for a term of ten years at the required monthly rental, and that defendant had refused to enter into any lease. The prayer of the complaint was for an amount of money which was alleged to be the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.