Pence

Pence v. Dennie

Good Law
1919 Cal. App. LEXIS 368·41 Cal. App. 428·182 P. 980
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJune 7, 1919Civ. No. 2895.California2,258 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Sloane, J.

The plaintiff, a contractor and builder, brought this action to recover from the defendant an alleged balance of $1,066.84 on a building contract totaling $46,750, together with $1,282.16 for extras alleged to have been furnished at the request of defendant, and four hundred dollars claimed as a bonus under the contract, making a total for which judgment was demanded of $2,759.

The defendant, by answer and counterclaim, admitted the original contract price of $46,750, but alleges payment of all but $90.35, denies liability for four hundred dollars bonus, or any part thereof, and claims damages against plaintiff of $450 for delay in completing contract, $1,523 for items of material and labor not furnished as called for by the contract, and $1,685.15 for defective work and materials, and asks judgment on his counterclaim for $3,427.69.

On the trial of the case the court found that the original contract price due the' plaintiff was $46,750, and that he was entitled to extras in the sum of $205, and no more, and disallowed his claim of four hundred dollars as a bonus. The court further found that the defendant has paid on the contract $45,969.36, thus leaving a credit due the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.