Giron

People v. Giron

Good Law
1928 Cal. App. LEXIS 516·94 Cal. App. 53·270 P. 462
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaSeptember 19, 1928Docket No. 1699.California527 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Conrey, J.

In each case the information charged that the defendant committed the crime of burglary by wilfully, unlawfully, etc., entering certain described premises “with the intent then and there and therein to commit the crime of larceny.” The cases were consolidated for trial. The jury found defendant guilty in each ease, and judgments were entered accordingly. He appeals from the judgments.

The sole ground of appeal is that the informations do not charge any public offenses, for the reason that under the amendments of the Penal Code, adopted in 1927, there is no longer a crime in this state by the name of larceny. Section 459 of the Penal Code, which defines burglary, provides that every person who enters any house, room, etc., “with intent to commit grand or petit larceny, or any felony is guilty of burglary.” It will be noted that the informations were drawn in accordance with this language of the statute.

Prior to the amendments to the Penal Code, made in the year 1927, larceny was the name given by the code (sec. 484) to the felonious stealing of personal property. The definition there given was, in substance, the common-law definition of that crime. For the purpose of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.