Roberts

Roberts v. Griffith Co.

Good Law
100 Cal. App. 456·1929 Cal. App. LEXIS 271·280 P. 199
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaAugust 28, 1929Docket No. 6700.California2,001 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Dooling, J.

From a judgment of dismissal, entered pursuant to an order sustaining defendant's demurrer to plaintiff's complaint without leave to amend, plaintiff appeals.

The complaint, in substance, alleges that Lynwood is a city of the sixth class and plaintiff was and is a deputy marshal thereof; that defendant was and is a corporation, chiefly engaged in doing street work, and in connection therewith owned more than twenty mules. That on October 24, 1926, at the hour of 10 o’clock P. M., defendant carelessly and negligently allowed about twenty of its mules to run at large, without a keeper or other supervision, upon the public streets of Lynwood, thereby creating a public nuisance by unlawfully obstructing the free passage and use in the customary manner of said streets in violation of section 370 of the Penal Code; that it thereupon became the duty of plaintiff, as a deputy marshal, to abate such nuisance and while engaged with two other deputy marshals in driving such mules from the streets plaintiff was thrown by such mules violently to the ground and his left leg broken to his damage. The demurrer was both general and special.

It is not contended by respondent that under the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.