Nelles

Nelles v. MacFarland

Good Law
1908 Cal. App. LEXIS 91·9 Cal. App. 534·99 P. 980
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaDecember 19, 1908Civ. No. 555.California1,399 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Shaw, J.

On September 15, 1903, the defendant, who at the time was general agent of the Prudential Insurance Company of America, but in his individual capacity, entered into a contract with plaintiff’s assignors, whereby the latter were appointed special agents in certain territory for the purpose of procuring applications for insurance in said company, and upon whom, by the terms of said contract, were imposed certain incidental duties connected with such employment. The contract consists of fourteen clauses inserted in numerical order and all of which consisted of printed matter, except clause 13, which was inserted in writing before the execution of the contract. We refer to those parts of the contract which we deem material to a consideration of the case.

By clause 6 of the contract it was provided that such special agent should be allowed for its services the “compensation only” as fixed by a schedule made a part of the contract (but not included in the record), which was a commission of the first year’s premiums collected in cash on policies of insurance procured through the efforts of such agent. By its terms no time was fixed for the termination of the contract, but clause 4…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.