Wilson

Wilson v. Shea

Good Law
1916 Cal. App. LEXIS 225·29 Cal. App. 788·157 P. 543
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaFebruary 28, 1916Civ. No. 1711.California1,458 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

James, J.

Appeal taken by defendants C. E. Cooper and Robert Marsh from a judgment entered against them, and from an order denying their motion for a new trial.

At a time anterior to the commencement of this action defendant R. P. Shea held contract rights in certain real property located in the city of Los Angeles. He exchanged these rights with one Vance for an automobile. At a later date Vance desired to dispose of the interest thus acquired in the real estate. Shea and Cooper at that time were both employed with Robert Marsh & Co., realty brokers. Under their contract of employment commissions earned on property sold were divided as follows: Shea, ten per cent; Cooper, fifty per cent; Robert Marsh, forty per cent. Vance being a friend of Shea’s and having purchased the contract rights in the lots from the latter, submitted to the firm mentioned his proposition to rid himself of his interest in the real estate. A purchaser was found in the person of one Mrs. Looney, the assignor of the plaintiff. The agent who represented Mrs. Looney, realizing that there might be a question regarding the title which it was possible to obtain under the contracts, insisted that a guaranty contract be…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.