McColgan

McColgan v. Board of Police Commissioners

Good Law
130 Cal. App. 66·1933 Cal. App. LEXIS 962·19 P.2d 815
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaFebruary 27, 1933Docket No. 8714.California1,116 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Sturtevant, J.

The plaintiff applied to the trial court for a writ of mandamus to compel the defendant board to grant her a pension, to be paid out of the police relief and pension fund, as the surviving widow of James McColgan, deceased. The trial court granted the writ and from that judgment the defendant board has appealed and has brought up the judgment-roll only.

In her petition for a writ of mandamus the plaintiff alleged the official capacity of the defendants; that she is the widow of James McColgan, deceased; that the defendant board has the power to provide pensions to a surviving widow of a deceased police officer who was killed in the performance of his duty; that James McColgan became a police officer on July 5, 1927, and so continued until his death on September 2, 1928; that his salary was $2,400 per year; that on September 2, 1928, while on duty and in the performance of his duties James McColgan was killed; that the plaintiff filed a petition with the defendant board asking for a pension; and that there are sufficient funds on hand to pay such pension. Continuing she alleged, “That at the hearing of your petitioner’s said petition for a pension she submitted evidence that…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.