Long

Long v. Harrison

Good Law
113 Cal. App. 321·1931 Cal. App. LEXIS 919·298 P. 148
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaApril 9, 1931Docket No. 4249.California1,428 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Upon further consideration of this cause we are led to the conclusion that there is sufficient evidence set forth in the transcript to sustain the judgment, save and except as to the modifications hereinafter set forth. Portions of the opinion filed herein upon first hearing may properly be adopted as expressing our views.

The complaint in this action consisted of two counts, the first of which was for money had and received, the second being for work, labor and service done, and material furnished. During the trial the case was dismissed as to defendant Jessie Calzasia and judgment was rendered against the remaining defendants for the amounts set forth in the complaint. Defendant W. IT. Scheckert alone appeals.

The evidence produced by respondent in support of the first count of the complaint was to the effect that $250 of the $1250 therein named was assigned to him by Thomas 0. Knight, and that the interest of his wife, Matilda E. Long, in the remaining sum of $1,000, was also assigned to him; that respondent and his wife were induced to place in the hands of defendants Harrison and Scheckert the said sum of $1,000 by reason of representations made by them that they had a…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.