Silverthorne

Silverthorne v. Simon

Good Law
1922 Cal. App. LEXIS 205·59 Cal. App. 494·211 P. 26
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaOctober 26, 1922Civ. No. 2516.California1,510 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Finch, J.

The complaint alleges that the plaintiff entered into an agreement in writing with the defendants to purchase from them a Kissel truck for the sum of $2,820, of which sum $1,215 was paid on the execution of the agreement and the balance was agreed to be paid in monthly installments of $133.75 on the fifteenth day of each month, commencing with May 15, 1920; that on the fifteenth and eighteenth days of May, 1920, plaintiff tendered the amount of the first installment but that his offer of payment was refused; that on the eighteenth day of May, 1920, the defendants wrongfully took possession of the truck and ever since have retained possession thereof. The prayer is for a recovery of the truck or its value and damages for its detention. The answer admits the taking of 'the truck by the defendants and, to justify such taking, alleges that the plaintiff refused to carry out the terms of the contract. The defendants were given judgment for their costs.

The contract, designated as an “automobile lease,” provides for the payment of a stipulated monthly rental for the use of the truck until such payments equal the balance of the purchase price, thereupon title to vest in the plaintiff.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.