Reeg

Reeg v. McArthur

Good Law
17 Cal. App. 203·1911 Cal. App. LEXIS 101·119 P. 105
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaOctober 2, 1911Civ. No. 999.California659 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

James, J.

This action was brought by plaintiff to recover certain sums of money from the defendants, separate causes of action being set forth in four different counts in the amended complaint. These alleged causes of action were founded upon an agreement entered into between plaintiff and defendants whereby certain real property in the state of Minnesota belonging to C. W. McArthur was agreed to be exchanged for certain real property belonging to one Mary K. Reeg, which was located in the county of Los Angeles. The plaintiff George Reeg prosecuted this .action as the assignee of the said Mary K. Reeg. A demurrer to the amended complaint interposed on behalf of defendant Mrs. L. M. McArthur was sustained by the court without leave to amend, and judgment followed accordingly. From this judgment plaintiff appeals.

The agreement for the exchange of the real property is attached to the amended complaint as an exhibit, and recites the conditions which were to affect the transaction. Among other things, it is provided that the title to the land of C. W. McArthur was to be conveyed clear, except that a certain mortgage of $3,000 was to be assumed by Mary K. Reeg, and the following condition was…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.