Gladding, McBean & Co. v. Montgomery

Good Law
1912 Cal. App. LEXIS 102·20 Cal. App. 276·128 P. 790
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaNovember 1, 1912Civ. No. 1101.California1,159 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Hall, J.

This is an appeal taken in accordance with the method provided by section 953a of the Code of Civil Procedure, from a judgment in favor of plaintiff for the sum of $825, for work and material performed and supplied by plaintiff in the construction of a tile roof for defendant.

The original contract was for the sum of $790, but this amount was increased by extra work by the amount of thirty-five dollars, making the total contract price $825, for which amount judgment was rendered.

The agreement was in writing, executed by defendant and by the plaintiff, under its seal and the signature of its secretary, and called for the construction of a roof of “No. 2 Mission Tile.”

The uncontradicted evidence of Oswald Spear, manager of plaintiff, was that “No. 2 Mission Tile” simply meant red tile of a certain kind and quality, but did not indicate any particular shade of red, and that such tile varied in shades of red as the necessary result of its process of manufacture. There is nothing in the written contract calling for tile of any particular shade of red; it is simply described as “No. 2 Mission Tile.”

The defense relied on is that there was “a previous or contemporaneous oral…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.