Clayton

Clayton v. Randolph Marketing Co.

Bad Law
1921 Cal. App. LEXIS 174·55 Cal. App. 523·203 P. 831
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaDecember 5, 1921Civ. No. 4035.California1,422 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Sturtevant, J.

The plaintiffs sued the defendant for an accounting; the trial court awarded the plaintiffs a judgment for $4,882.13, and the defendant has appealed. The trial court tried the case sitting without a jury, and made findings in which it found that the defendant was a corporation; that on September 20, 1918, the plaintiffs and defendant entered into a written contract which is fully set forth in plaintiffs’ complaint; that the plaintiffs have fully performed said contract; that in doing so the plaintiffs delivered to the defendant to be marketed sixty-five carloads and some broken lots of lettuce; that the defendant received the produce and sold the same for $69,470.98 on board the cars at the place of sale; that the defendant paid freight and expressage in the sum of $15,736.63; that the defendant paid expressage for sundry items in the sum of $65.75; demurrage, $32.36; refrigeration, $.175; taxes,. $237.30; and that the net sale price on board the ears at point of delivery was $53,223.94. The court also found that the defendant had advanced to the plaintiffs $37,697.03, and that it was entitled to a commission of twenty per cent on the net sales or in the sum of $10,644.79.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.