Bagley
Bagley v. Lilienthal
19 Cal. App. 273·1912 Cal. App. LEXIS 46·125 P. 938
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJune 15, 1912Civ. No. 1042.California76 words
Lead Opinion
This case involves the same questions as Bagley v. Bloom et al. (No. 1041), ante, p. 255, [ 125 P. 931 ], and for the reasons stated in the opinion this day filed therein, the judgment is affirmed. Lennon, P. J., and Kerrigan, J., concurred. A petition to have the cause heard in the supreme court, after judgment in the district court of appeal, was denied by the supreme court on August 14, 1912. *Page 274