Knight

The plaintiffs procured separate judgments in consolidated actions for damages against the defendants, Gosselin, Andrew Poscie and Prank Poscie, as joint tort-feasors, for personal injuries sustained in an automobile casualty. These judgments were rendered pursuant to verdicts which were found by a jury. The causes were dismissed as to other defendants. A new trial was granted to the defendants Andrew and Prank Poscie at their request. The original judgment against the defendant Gosselin became final. In a subsequent trial upon the same pleadings in which they were joined with the defendant Gosselin as joint tort-feasors another jury found a verdict of damages against the defendants Andrew and Prank Poscie for the same ■ amount for which the original judgment was rendered. Judgment against these appellants was rendered accordingly. A subsequent motion for new trial was denied. From this last-mentioned judgment the defendants Andrew and Frank Poscic have appealed.

The appellants operated a garage at Eureka. They were possessed of a new Velie sedan automobile, which they kept at the garage for sale. The defendant Gosselin was a railroad brakeman, who was employed with the…