Hanchett

Hanchett v. Wiseley

Good Law
107 Cal. App. 230·1930 Cal. App. LEXIS 403·290 P. 311
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJuly 12, 1930Docket No. 125.California1,331 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Marks, J.

On November 6, 1926, the plaintiffs, who were husband and wife, were riding in an automobile on the highway between San Diego, California, and Tijuana, Mexico. At a point on the highway, approximately ten miles southerly from the city of San Diego, their car came into collision with one driven by Conway Wiseley, and Elizabeth C. Hanchett was injured. A trial by jury was waived and the trial court entered judgment against both defendants. There is no question of Wiseley’s negligence and that respondents are entitled to judgment against him.

The trial court found, in its finding number three, “That at the time of said collision said Conway Wiseley was employed by defendant, Reo Motor Car Company of California, a corporation, as its servant and employee, and at the time of the collision, hereinbefore mentioned, said Conway Wiseley was operating and driving and controlling the said automobile in which he was riding for said defendant, Reo Motor Car Company of California, a corporation, and was acting within the scope of his employment by said Reo Motor Car Company, a corporation, at the time of said collision and as the servant and employee of said defendant, Reo Motor Car Company of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.