Reidy

Reidy v. Young

Good Law
119 Cal. App. 322·1931 Cal. App. LEXIS 65·6 P.2d 112
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaDecember 21, 1931Docket No. 8053.California1,128 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Nourse, J.

Plaintiff sued to foreclose a mortgage on real property. By an amended complaint Merchants National Trust and Savings Bank of Los Angeles was joined as a party defendant. This party filed a cross-complaint joining plaintiff and the original defendants as cross-defendants. The trial was had on the cross-complaint. The trust company had judgment for foreclosure of the mortgage which it held as collateral security for a loan to plaintiff Reidy. The latter had judgment for the amount due him after the trust company’s claim had been satisfied which was made payable out of the proceeds of the sale on foreclosure. The case was dismissed as to the defendant Young, the maker of the note which the mortgage secured. There was no deficiency judgment. The defendants Onnik Timourian and wife purchased the property subject to the mortgage prior to the institution of these proceedings. Against them the judgment awarded costs accruing subsequent to the filing of their answer to the cross-complaint. Upon the filing of the original complaint, and based upon its allegations, a receiver was appointed who took possession of the property and collected all rents and profits. Prior to the entry of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.