Dunham

Dunham v. McDonald

Good Law
1917 Cal. App. LEXIS 192·34 Cal. App. 744·168 P. 1063
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaOctober 3, 1917Civ. No. 1827.California1,271 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

James, J.

Appeal from an affirmative judgment entered in favor of defendant. Plaintiff brought this action to recover moneys which he alleged remained in the hands of defendant and to which plaintiff was entitled. On the eighteenth day of August, 1910, pursuant to negotiations theretofore had, defendant addressed a letter to the plaintiff at Santa Paula, California, in the following terms:

Written acceptance of this proposition was made by the plaintiff. Thereafter defendant disposed of his rights in the land and lease. Plaintiff in his complaint alleged that defendant received the sum of thirteen thousand five hundred dollars as consideration for his rights in the land, but that defendant by communications and statements led the plaintiff to believe that defendant received only the sum of ten thousand dollars; that settlement was made upon the basis of the •ten thousand dollar consideration, and that after October 22, 1912, plaintiff for the first time learned that defendant had received more than ten thousand dollars for his interest in the land and lease. The prayer of the complaint was for judgment for the sum of $765.62. Defendant in'his answer took no issue upon the allegation in…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.