Trask

Trask v. Garza

Good Law
1921 Cal. App. LEXIS 742·51 Cal. App. 739·197 P. 807
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMarch 15, 1921Civ. No. 3361.California1,387 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

James, J.

This appeal is taken by the defendants from an adverse judgment and is presented upon the judgment-roll alone.

The points urged as ground for reversal rest upon the ruling of the trial judge in refusing to sustain a demurrer interposed by the defendants to the second amended complaint of the plaintiff. The grounds of that demurrer to be here considered are: (1) That said complaint did not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action as against defendants or either of them; (2) that there was a misjoinder in that appellant Johnson was improperly included as a defendant in the action.

The plaintiff alleged in his complaint that in September, 1919, a written agreement was entered into between plain tiff and the two Garzas, whereby plaintiff agreed to buy, and said defendants agreed to sell, a certain pool-hall and business with the furnishings and fixtures for the sum of $700. Other terms and conditions were alleged in the complaint to be as follows: “Plaintiff to execute his promissory note for the sum of $350 payable to said defendants Garza, sixty days after date and deliver the same together with $350 in cash to the defendant E. L. Johnson; and defendants Garza to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.