Hurley

Hurley v. Lake County

Good Law
133 Cal. App. 219·1933 Cal. App. LEXIS 524·23 P.2d 838
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJuly 8, 1933Docket No. 4838.California821 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Pullen, J.

Plaintiff filed a complaint to recover for personal injuries; to this complaint a demurrer was interposed and by the court overruled. Defendants answered and in due time the cause was set for trial. Plaintiff failed to appear at the time of trial and judgment of dismissal was entered. Upon appeal the judgment of dismissal was set aside (Hurley v. Lake County, 113 Cal. App. 291 [ 298 Pac. 123, 125 ]) on the ground of the insufficiency of the notice of the trial. In its opinion the appellate court, in considering the complaint, said: “While the clerk’s trans-script shows that the demurrer to the plaintiff’s complaint was overruled it appears from the case which we have cited (Benton v. City of Santa Monica, 106 Cal. 339 [ 289 Pac. 203 ]) that the complaint is manifestly insufficient and should be amended if the facts warrant such action. ’ ’

Thereafter, in accordance with the suggestion in the opinion, a notice of the motion was presented by plaintiff for leave to file her first amended complaint. The motion was by the court denied.

After such denial of the motion, no judgment having been entered in favor of defendant upon the original complaint, and no order sustaining a demurrer…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.